I slay blazes.
Sheree. (It means "dear" in French.) INFP. Aged 22 and a big ol' nerd, most of the time I think I'm hilarious. I hope my (multi-fandom) blog makes you a little happier.

Sometimes I liveblog things and make personal posts. My tags showcase my personality. I'm also angry at the patriarchy.

Queue is always on.

 slaying blazes

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected




i found the video


Are you shitting me?

this makes me smile every time

""Women are the niggers of gender," the email said. "If you killed yourself, I wouldn’t even fuck the corpse."

I blinked at my phone, fighting simultaneous urges to hurl my phone across the room in anger and cry. Later that day, someone texted me my address — telling me they’d “See me when I least expected it.”

I haven’t been out to my car at night by myself since January 2nd.

My name is Brianna Wu. I lead a development studio that makes games. Sometimes, I write about issues in the games industry that relate to the equality of women. My reward is that I regularly have men threatening to rape and commit acts of violence against me."


In honor of National Dog Day, here’s a video of my sister’s dog struggling to get inside.


Popular HP text posts- part 2 (click for HQ) (part 1


spidergwen: Could you please do Korrasami + 7? Thanks very much! :)

something a little more passionate under the cut

Read More


spidergwen: Could you please do Korrasami + 7? Thanks very much! :)

something a little more passionate under the cut

Read More



What is the deal with all the May hate?

I get that the promo came out, and Skye is now wearing black tactical gear and sliding down a rope / running in a dramatic fashion, but why does that equate to May hate? Why do we assume that Skye becoming tougher and wearing black means that she is going to be a heartless bitch? Or that this is May’s fault? Or that May is a heartless bitch? Let’s recap what happened last season: Skye joined S.H.I.E.L.D., was shot and nearly killed, and then was kidnapped. She has every reason to want to protect herself. She said in “Yes Men” that she couldn’t wait to be well enough so that she could train harder so that she could rescue herself in the future. I love that about Skye. Why are we treating that like a tragedy?

For that matter, it still saddens me that so many people see May as an evil bitch. I don’t see her that way at all.

A lot of people seem to think that anything they liked about Skye last year was 10000% because of Coulson, as if she is defined by the role models in her life instead of an entity on her own. (I see over and over again people saying that Skye has had such a positive influence from Coulson, that Ward lacked. As if she was in some kind of cocoon her entire life up until the moment she met the brave white man like A FEW MONTHS AGO when she was most likely the same person she is now.) There’s this weird tendency to treat Skye like some kind of young child who will emulate mommy and daddy in every way, and now she is in the “wrong” because she will be cold and distant and taking after the “damaged” parent.

As if Skye didn’t already know plenty of self-preservation already. She just wants to not seem like the weak link or the easy prey. She wants to not get shot in the gut both literally and figuratively again. I get that people don’t want her to lose the spark that makes Skye herself, but I don’t know why we would assume that she will. She’s been through a lot of rough shit before, from what little we know of her past. She turned out okay.

Being betrayed by Grant Ward isn’t going to be the moment that re-defines her, and neither is taking advice from Melinda May. (Though seriously. May, known for her pranks and her sarcasm, is not exactly a bad person to take after.) She might stumble a little, sort of like the way she almost bounced off the punching bag every time she hit it, but she’ll recover. She’ll find her way. 

Hackers are adaptive.





If Fox thinks that a Muslim can’t write a book about Christianity

would they agree that men can’t write legislation about women?



This is why you shouldn't click on the naked photos of Jennifer Lawrence 


If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies.
In what’s being called the biggest celebrity hacking incident in internet history, more than 100 female celebrities have had their private nude images stolen and published online. The bulk of the images posted have been officially confirmed as belonging to Jennifer Lawrence, but a complete list of victims’ names - including Krysten Ritter, Kate Upton, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Rihanna, Brie Larson and Kirsten Dunst - has been subsequently published. (Link does not contain pictures, only names.)
The images were first uploaded by an anonymous member of the underground internet sewer known as 4chan and have since been enthusiastically shared across platforms like Reddit and Twitter. A representative for Lawrence has confirmed the images are real, condemning the theft of them as a “flagrant violation of privacy” and adding that “The authorities have been contacted and will prosecute anyone who posts the stolen photos.”
There are a few different issues that a criminal act like this brings up, but before I get into them it’s necessary to make one thing clear: If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies. These images - which I have not seen and which I will not look for - are intimate, private moments belonging only to the people who appear in them and who they have invited to see them. To have those moments stolen and broadcast to the world is an egregious act of psychic violence which constitutes a form of assault.
The people sharing these images are perpetuating an ongoing assault. The people gleefully looking at them are witnessing and enjoying an ongoing assault. When you have been asked by victims of a crime like this not to exacerbate the pain of that crime and you continue to do so anyway, you are consciously deciding that your enjoyment, your rights and perhaps even just your curiosity are more important than the safety and dignity of the people you’re exploiting.
That out of the way, let’s get a few other things straight.
1. This is not a ‘scandal’
It’s a crime, and we should be discussing it as such. Some media outlets are salaciously reporting it otherwise, as if the illegal violation of privacy involving intimate images is little more than subject for gossip. When associated with sex, the word ‘scandal’ has been typically interpreted as something that assigns responsibility to all parties involved, a consensual act unfortunately discovered and for which everyone owes an explanation or apology. Remember when private nude photos of Vanessa Hudgens (whose name also appears on the list of victims) were leaked online and Disney forced her to publicly apologise for her “lapse in judgment” and hoped she had “learned a valuable lesson”? Never mind that Hudgens was an adult and a victim of privacy violation - the ‘scandal’ was painted as something for which she owed her fans an apology. Which leads us to:
2. These women do not ‘only have themselves to blame’
While depressing, it’s sadly unsurprising to see some people arguing that Lawrence et al brought this on themselves. Part of living in a rape culture is the ongoing expectation that women are responsible for protecting themselves from abuse, and that means avoiding behaviour which might be later ‘exploited’ by the people who are conveniently never held to account for their actions. But women are entitled to consensually engage in their sexuality any way they see fit. If that involves taking nude self portraits for the enjoyment of themselves or consciously selected others, that’s their prerogative.
Victims of crime do not have an obligation to accept dual responsibility for that crime. Women who take nude photographs of themselves are not committing a criminal act, and they shouldn’t ‘expect’ to become victims to one, as actress Mary E. Winstead pointed out on Twitter. 
Sending a photograph of your breasts to one person isn’t consenting to having the whole world see those breasts, just as consenting to sex with one person isn’t the same as giving permission for everyone else to fu*k you. Victim blaming isn’t okay, even if it does give you a private thrill to humiliate the female victims of sexual exploitation.
3. It doesn’t matter that ‘damn, she looks good and should own it!’
Stealing and sharing the private photographs of women doesn’t become less of a crime just because you approve them for fapping activity. I’m sure many of the women on this list are confident of their sexual attractiveness. It doesn’t mean they don’t value their privacy or shouldn’t expect to enjoy the same rights to it as everyone else. It also doesn’t mean they want strangers sweating over their images. That line of thinking comes from the same school which instructs women to either ignore of welcome sexual harassment when it’s seemingly ‘positive’ in its sentiments.
None of these women are likely to give a shit that you think their bodies are ‘tight, damn’. Despite what society reinforces to us about the public ownership of women’s bodies, we are not entitled to co-opt and objectify them just because we think we can defend it as a compliment.
I will not be seeking out these images out and I urge everyone else to avoid doing the same. I hope that all the women who have been victimised here are being appropriately supported by the authorities and their network of friends. And I hope sincerely that more people take a stand against this kind of behaviour.
Because this incident aside, it strikes me as deeply ironic that we will vehemently protest a free Facebook messenger app because we’re outraged at reports that it can access our phone’s numbers, and yet turn around and excuse the serving up of women’s bodies for our own pleasure. Our appreciation is no less disgusting just because it’s accompanied by the sound of one hand clapping.